|
|
EVENT>LM/NLM Mixer |SESSION>Monday Eve |SECTION> A
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>November 14, 2011 |CLUB NO.>199240 | 11/14/2011 21:42
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Gene LaBove |RATING>Club Masterpoint (80% Open) |MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE> 54.0 |TOP> 4 |MP LIMITS>None |CLUB>Village Card Club, Inc.
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS> 10 ,------------,-------,-------------,------,------,
-------------------------------------------------| Section |Handi- | Section | |Sect. |
No Name Name | Rank| Total| cap | Rank|Score | Pct |Awards|
------------------------------------------------- ----- ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------
1 Betty Schultz Kim Kelley 56.00 7.50 48.50 44.91
2 Ray Banks Gynnie Ambrozich 1 69.50 5.50 1 64.00 59.26 0.80
3 Wanda Crader Becky Rice 57.50 2.50 55.00 50.93
4 Helen Raxsdale Kenneth Pyles 53.00 5.00 48.00 44.44
5 Millie Heisler Milton Matzek 4 62.50 2.50 2 60.00 55.56 0.42
6 Andy Cosby Tricia Adcock 46.50 5.50 41.00 37.96
7 Luci Lewis Mack Williams 57.50 3.50 54.00 50.00
8 Richard Wendricks Danielle Smith 2 69.00 9.50 3 59.50 55.09 0.48
9 Teri LaBove Mary Ann Foster 56.00 4.00 52.00 48.15
10 Nancy Luehring Mary Kay Stockford 3 64.50 6.50 4 58.00 53.70 0.34
Totals 592.00 52.00 540.00
|
| Board 1 North Deals None Vul |
♠ A J 9 3 ♥ — ♦ K 9 7 6 5 4 ♣ Q 4 2 |
||||||||||
♠ 10 7 5 ♥ Q 8 6 2 ♦ 8 3 2 ♣ A K 3 |
|
♠ — ♥ K 10 9 7 5 3 ♦ A Q J 10 ♣ 10 8 5 |
|||||||||
| ♠ K Q 8 6 4 2 ♥ A J 4 ♦ — ♣ J 9 7 6 |
|||||||||||
NS 5♠; EW 5♥; NS 1N; N 2♣; S 1♣
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 4 ♥ S | ♣ A | 450 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 6-Cosby-Adcock vs 5-Heisler-Matzek | ||
| 4 ♠ N | ♣ A | 450 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 7-Lewis-Williams vs 3-Crader-Rice | ||
| 4 ♠ S | ♣ A | 450 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 8-Wendricks-Smith | ||
| 2 ♠ S | ♣ A | 170 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 9-LaBove-Foster vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich | ||
| 4 ♠ x S | ♣ A | 100 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4-Raxsdale-Pyles vs 1-Schultz-Kelley | ||
| Board 2 East Deals N-S Vul |
♠ 6 3 2 ♥ A K Q ♦ Q 10 9 2 ♣ A K 2 |
||||||||||
♠ J 9 ♥ J 6 ♦ A K 8 7 6 5 ♣ 9 5 3 |
|
♠ A K Q 10 8 5 4 ♥ 8 7 3 2 ♦ — ♣ 6 4 |
|||||||||
| ♠ 7 ♥ 10 9 5 4 ♦ J 4 3 ♣ Q J 10 8 7 |
|||||||||||
EW 3♠; NS 2♥; NS 3♣; NS 1♦
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 4 ♠ x E | ♣ Q | 100 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 4-Raxsdale-Pyles vs 1-Schultz-Kelley | ||
| 3 ♠ E | ♣ Q | 50 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 8-Wendricks-Smith | ||
| 4 ♣ S | ♠ J | 100 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 7-Lewis-Williams vs 3-Crader-Rice | ||
| 3 ♠ E | ♣ Q | 140 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 9-LaBove-Foster vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich | ||
| 2 NT N | ♠ A | 400 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 6-Cosby-Adcock vs 5-Heisler-Matzek | ||
| Board 3 South Deals E-W Vul |
♠ A K 2 ♥ K Q 3 ♦ Q 7 6 4 ♣ 9 8 2 |
||||||||||
♠ Q J 10 9 8 7 4 ♥ J 10 4 ♦ A K ♣ A |
|
♠ 5 3 ♥ 9 8 7 5 2 ♦ J 10 9 8 ♣ 6 3 |
|||||||||
| ♠ 6 ♥ A 6 ♦ 5 3 2 ♣ K Q J 10 7 5 4 |
|||||||||||
NS 4N; NS 4♣; EW 2♠; NS 2♦; EW 1♥
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 3 NT N | ♠ 3 | 490 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 9-LaBove-Foster vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich | ||
| 3 NT N | ♠ 5 | 460 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 7-Lewis-Williams vs 3-Crader-Rice | ||
| 3 NT N | ♥ 5 | 430 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 8-Wendricks-Smith | ||
| 3 ♠ W | ♣ 9 | 100 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 6-Cosby-Adcock vs 5-Heisler-Matzek | ||
| 5 ♣ x S | ♦ K | 100 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4-Raxsdale-Pyles vs 1-Schultz-Kelley | ||
| Board 4 West Deals Both Vul |
♠ K Q 7 6 5 2 ♥ — ♦ J 8 2 ♣ K Q 8 7 |
||||||||||
♠ J 3 ♥ A K 10 6 ♦ A Q 10 7 5 ♣ 9 4 |
|
♠ 9 8 4 ♥ J 9 5 4 ♦ 9 ♣ A 10 6 5 2 |
|||||||||
| ♠ A 10 ♥ Q 8 7 3 2 ♦ K 6 4 3 ♣ J 3 |
|||||||||||
NS 3♠; EW 3♥; S 1N; EW 1♦; EW 1♣
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 3 ♦ W | ♣ K | 300 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 7-Lewis-Williams vs 6-Cosby-Adcock | ||
| 2 ♠ N | ♦ 9 | 140 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 5-Heisler-Matzek vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich | ||
| 3 ♠ N | ♦ 9 | 140 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 8-Wendricks-Smith vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles | ||
| 3 ♠ N | ♦ 9 | 140 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 9-LaBove-Foster | ||
| 4 ♠ N | ♦ 9 | 100 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 1-Schultz-Kelley vs 3-Crader-Rice | ||
| Board 5 North Deals N-S Vul |
♠ K 9 ♥ J 7 3 ♦ J 8 2 ♣ A 8 7 5 4 |
||||||||||
♠ Q 10 8 ♥ A Q 10 8 6 5 2 ♦ — ♣ Q J 6 |
|
♠ A 7 6 5 4 3 ♥ 9 ♦ K 10 7 4 ♣ 10 3 |
|||||||||
| ♠ J 2 ♥ K 4 ♦ A Q 9 6 5 3 ♣ K 9 2 |
|||||||||||
EW 3♠; EW 3♥; S 2N; NS 2♦; S 2♣; N 1♣
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 4 ♠ E | ♦ A | 50 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 5-Heisler-Matzek vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich | ||
| 3 ♥ W | ♥ J | 140 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 7-Lewis-Williams vs 6-Cosby-Adcock | ||
| 3 ♥ W | ♦ 2 | 140 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 9-LaBove-Foster | ||
| 5 ♦ S | ♥ A | 300 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 1-Schultz-Kelley vs 3-Crader-Rice | ||
| 4 ♦ S | ♥ A | 300 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 8-Wendricks-Smith vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles | ||
| Board 6 East Deals E-W Vul |
♠ 10 7 6 4 3 ♥ J 7 ♦ A 7 ♣ J 10 7 2 |
||||||||||
♠ K 9 5 2 ♥ A 4 ♦ J 8 6 3 ♣ A 6 4 |
|
♠ Q J ♥ K 10 8 6 3 ♦ Q 9 2 ♣ 8 5 3 |
|||||||||
| ♠ A 8 ♥ Q 9 5 2 ♦ K 10 5 4 ♣ K Q 9 |
|||||||||||
NS 1♠; EW 1♦; NS 1♣
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 2 ♠ N | ♣ 8 | 110 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 8-Wendricks-Smith vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles | ||
| 1 NT S | ♠ 2 | 50 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 1-Schultz-Kelley vs 3-Crader-Rice | ||
| 1 NT S | ♠ 2 | 50 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 5-Heisler-Matzek vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich | ||
| 1 NT S | ♠ 2 | 50 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 7-Lewis-Williams vs 6-Cosby-Adcock | ||
| 1 NT S | ♠ 2 | 50 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 9-LaBove-Foster | ||
| Board 7 South Deals Both Vul |
♠ J 10 ♥ Q 10 ♦ K Q 8 7 6 ♣ J 9 6 5 |
||||||||||
♠ 7 ♥ A J 9 6 2 ♦ J 10 3 2 ♣ K 8 7 |
|
♠ A 5 4 3 ♥ 8 7 5 4 3 ♦ 9 5 ♣ A 3 |
|||||||||
| ♠ K Q 9 8 6 2 ♥ K ♦ A 4 ♣ Q 10 4 2 |
|||||||||||
EW 3♥; NS 2♠; NS 2♣; NS 1♦
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 2 ♠ S | ♦ J | 140 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 8-Wendricks-Smith vs 7-Lewis-Williams | ||
| 2 ♠ S | ♦ J | 140 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 9-LaBove-Foster vs 5-Heisler-Matzek | ||
| 2 ♠ S | ♦ 2 | 110 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 6-Cosby-Adcock vs 3-Crader-Rice | ||
| 3 ♥ W | ♠ J | 170 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 2-Banks-Ambrozich vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles | ||
| 4 ♥ W | ♠ J | 620 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 1-Schultz-Kelley | ||
| Board 8 West Deals None Vul |
♠ J 7 4 ♥ A 4 3 ♦ A 6 4 3 2 ♣ A J |
||||||||||
♠ A 6 5 ♥ J ♦ J 10 7 5 ♣ 8 6 5 4 2 |
|
♠ K 10 2 ♥ K 10 9 8 6 5 ♦ K Q 9 ♣ 3 |
|||||||||
| ♠ Q 9 8 3 ♥ Q 7 2 ♦ 8 ♣ K Q 10 9 7 |
|||||||||||
NS 2N; NS 2♠; NS 2♣; EW 1♥
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 3 ♥ E | ♦ 8 | 100 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 2-Banks-Ambrozich vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles | ||
| 2 ♠ S | ♥ J | 50 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 1-Schultz-Kelley | ||
| 3 ♠ S | ♥ J | 100 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 6-Cosby-Adcock vs 3-Crader-Rice | ||
| 3 ♠ S | ♥ J | 100 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 8-Wendricks-Smith vs 7-Lewis-Williams | ||
| 2 ♥ E | ♦ 8 | 110 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 9-LaBove-Foster vs 5-Heisler-Matzek | ||
| Board 9 North Deals E-W Vul |
♠ 10 6 ♥ K 5 3 ♦ A Q J 6 3 ♣ 9 7 4 |
||||||||||
♠ K Q 4 3 ♥ 10 7 2 ♦ 7 5 ♣ 8 6 5 2 |
|
♠ A 8 7 5 ♥ A Q 9 8 6 ♦ 10 4 ♣ Q 10 |
|||||||||
| ♠ J 9 2 ♥ J 4 ♦ K 9 8 2 ♣ A K J 3 |
|||||||||||
EW 2♠; EW 2♥; NS 3♦; NS 1N; NS 2♣
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 3 ♦ N | ♦ 10 | 150 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 2-Banks-Ambrozich vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles | ||
| 3 ♦ N | ♣ Q | 130 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 6-Cosby-Adcock vs 3-Crader-Rice | ||
| 2 ♥ E | ♣ A | 100 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 8-Wendricks-Smith vs 7-Lewis-Williams | ||
| 2 ♥ E | ♣ A | 100 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 1-Schultz-Kelley | ||
| 2 ♠ W | ♣ 7 | 110 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 9-LaBove-Foster vs 5-Heisler-Matzek | ||
| Board 10 East Deals Both Vul |
♠ A J 10 6 ♥ K J 10 9 ♦ 10 7 ♣ K 10 5 |
||||||||||
♠ K 3 ♥ A 7 5 3 ♦ A K J 9 2 ♣ A 4 |
|
♠ 8 5 4 2 ♥ Q 8 4 ♦ 8 4 3 ♣ 8 7 2 |
|||||||||
| ♠ Q 9 7 ♥ 6 2 ♦ Q 6 5 ♣ Q J 9 6 3 |
|||||||||||
NS 2♠; NS 3♣; EW 2♦; EW 1♥
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 3 ♥ W | ♣ K | 200 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 7-Lewis-Williams vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles | ||
| 2 NT W | ♥ J | 100 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich | ||
| 1 NT S | ♦ A | 90 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 3-Crader-Rice vs 5-Heisler-Matzek | ||
| 2 ♣ S | ♠ K | 90 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 9-LaBove-Foster vs 8-Wendricks-Smith | ||
| 2 ♦ W | ♣ 5 | 90 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 1-Schultz-Kelley vs 6-Cosby-Adcock | ||
| Board 11 South Deals None Vul |
♠ K 4 ♥ Q 10 5 4 3 ♦ Q 4 ♣ A J 9 4 |
||||||||||
♠ A Q 10 8 2 ♥ A 8 7 ♦ 9 7 ♣ 8 6 2 |
|
♠ J 6 5 ♥ J 9 ♦ 10 8 3 2 ♣ K Q 7 5 |
|||||||||
| ♠ 9 7 3 ♥ K 6 2 ♦ A K J 6 5 ♣ 10 3 |
|||||||||||
NS 4♥; NS 4♦; NS 2N; NS 2♣; EW 1♠
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 4 ♥ N | ♠ 5 | 450 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 1-Schultz-Kelley vs 6-Cosby-Adcock | ||
| 4 ♥ N | ♠ J | 450 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 7-Lewis-Williams vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles | ||
| 3 ♥ N | ♠ 5 | 200 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich | ||
| 3 ♥ N | ♦ 2 | 140 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 3-Crader-Rice vs 5-Heisler-Matzek | ||
| 3 NT N | ♠ 5 | 50 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 9-LaBove-Foster vs 8-Wendricks-Smith | ||
| Board 12 West Deals N-S Vul |
♠ K J 8 4 ♥ 7 4 ♦ A 2 ♣ Q J 10 5 3 |
||||||||||
♠ Q 3 2 ♥ A K 6 5 ♦ J 7 5 3 ♣ 8 2 |
|
♠ 7 5 ♥ J 10 9 8 3 ♦ 8 6 4 ♣ A 9 7 |
|||||||||
| ♠ A 10 9 6 ♥ Q 2 ♦ K Q 10 9 ♣ K 6 4 |
|||||||||||
NS 4♠; NS 4♣; NS 3♦; NS 1N; EW 1♥
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 4 ♠ N | ♥ J | 620 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 1-Schultz-Kelley vs 6-Cosby-Adcock | ||
| 4 ♠ S | ♥ A | 620 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 3-Crader-Rice vs 5-Heisler-Matzek | ||
| 3 ♠ N | ♥ J | 170 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich | ||
| 2 NT S | ♣ 5 | 100 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 7-Lewis-Williams vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles | ||
| 4 ♠ N | ♥ J | 100 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 9-LaBove-Foster vs 8-Wendricks-Smith | ||
| Board 13 North Deals Both Vul |
♠ J 6 5 3 2 ♥ 10 5 3 ♦ Q 10 9 6 ♣ K |
||||||||||
♠ 8 4 ♥ A K 7 6 4 ♦ K 8 4 ♣ 10 7 3 |
|
♠ A K ♥ J 9 8 ♦ A 7 3 2 ♣ Q J 8 5 |
|||||||||
| ♠ Q 10 9 7 ♥ Q 2 ♦ J 5 ♣ A 9 6 4 2 |
|||||||||||
EW 5♥; EW 3N; EW 3♦; EW 3♣; NS 1♠
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 3 NT E | ♠ 7 | 100 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 2-Banks-Ambrozich vs 7-Lewis-Williams | ||
| 3 NT E | ♠ 7 | 600 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 8-Wendricks-Smith vs 5-Heisler-Matzek | ||
| 4 ♥ E | ♠ 9 | 650 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 4-Raxsdale-Pyles vs 6-Cosby-Adcock | ||
| 3 NT E | ♣ 4 | 660 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 3-Crader-Rice | ||
| 3 NT E | ♠ 7 | 690 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 1-Schultz-Kelley vs 9-LaBove-Foster | ||
| Board 14 East Deals None Vul |
♠ 8 2 ♥ K 10 4 ♦ A J 6 5 ♣ 10 7 4 2 |
||||||||||
♠ A 6 ♥ 9 8 2 ♦ Q 8 7 2 ♣ 8 6 5 3 |
|
♠ K 7 4 ♥ Q J 7 6 5 ♦ 9 4 ♣ A K 9 |
|||||||||
| ♠ Q J 10 9 5 3 ♥ A 3 ♦ K 10 3 ♣ Q J |
|||||||||||
NS 2♠; NS 2♦; EW 1♥; NS 1♣
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 2 ♠ S | ♥ 9 | 140 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 4-Raxsdale-Pyles vs 6-Cosby-Adcock | ||
| 3 ♠ S | ♥ 9 | 140 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 3-Crader-Rice | ||
| 2 ♠ S | ♥ 9 | 110 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 8-Wendricks-Smith vs 5-Heisler-Matzek | ||
| 2 ♥ E | ♠ Q | 50 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 1-Schultz-Kelley vs 9-LaBove-Foster | ||
| 3 ♠ S | ♥ 9 | 50 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2-Banks-Ambrozich vs 7-Lewis-Williams | ||
| Board 15 South Deals N-S Vul |
♠ K 2 ♥ A 6 5 2 ♦ K 7 ♣ K 9 8 7 5 |
||||||||||
♠ J 8 6 5 ♥ 10 9 8 3 ♦ 8 3 ♣ Q 4 3 |
|
♠ Q 9 7 4 3 ♥ K Q J ♦ J 10 9 5 ♣ J |
|||||||||
| ♠ A 10 ♥ 7 4 ♦ A Q 6 4 2 ♣ A 10 6 2 |
|||||||||||
NS 6♣; NS 5N; NS 5♦; NS 3♥
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 3 NT N | ♦ J | 690 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 8-Wendricks-Smith vs 5-Heisler-Matzek | ||
| 3 NT S | ♠ 5 | 660 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 1-Schultz-Kelley vs 9-LaBove-Foster | ||
| 3 NT N | ♠ J | 660 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 2-Banks-Ambrozich vs 7-Lewis-Williams | ||
| 3 NT N | ♦ 6 | 660 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 4-Raxsdale-Pyles vs 6-Cosby-Adcock | ||
| 3 NT S | ♠ 5 | 660 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 3-Crader-Rice | ||
| Board 16 West Deals E-W Vul |
♠ 8 4 ♥ A K J ♦ Q 5 ♣ Q J 8 7 5 4 |
||||||||||
♠ 9 6 2 ♥ 10 4 ♦ A K J 9 8 2 ♣ A 2 |
|
♠ A Q 7 5 3 ♥ Q 9 6 5 2 ♦ 10 ♣ 6 3 |
|||||||||
| ♠ K J 10 ♥ 8 7 3 ♦ 7 6 4 3 ♣ K 10 9 |
|||||||||||
EW 3♠; EW 2N; EW 2♥; EW 2♦; NS 2♣
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 3 NT W | ♣ 7 | 400 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 5-Heisler-Matzek vs 7-Lewis-Williams | ||
| 3 NT W | ♥ A | 200 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 2-Banks-Ambrozich vs 1-Schultz-Kelley | ||
| 3 ♠ E | ♣ 10 | 100 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 9-LaBove-Foster vs 6-Cosby-Adcock | ||
| 3 ♠ E | ♣ K | 100 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles | ||
| 3 ♣ N | ♦ 10 | 50 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3-Crader-Rice vs 8-Wendricks-Smith | ||
| Board 17 North Deals None Vul |
♠ 9 6 5 3 2 ♥ 7 6 ♦ 9 4 2 ♣ Q 8 5 |
||||||||||
♠ A K Q 4 ♥ K 9 5 ♦ 8 7 6 ♣ 10 9 3 |
|
♠ 10 8 ♥ Q 10 8 4 2 ♦ K J 5 ♣ K 6 2 |
|||||||||
| ♠ J 7 ♥ A J 3 ♦ A Q 10 3 ♣ A J 7 4 |
|||||||||||
NS 2♠; EW 2♥; E 1N; NS 2♦; NS 2♣
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 2 ♠ S | ♠ A | 140 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 2-Banks-Ambrozich vs 1-Schultz-Kelley | ||
| 2 ♠ S | ♣ 10 | 110 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 5-Heisler-Matzek vs 7-Lewis-Williams | ||
| 2 ♠ S | ♠ A | 110 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 9-LaBove-Foster vs 6-Cosby-Adcock | ||
| 2 ♠ S | ♠ A | 50 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 3-Crader-Rice vs 8-Wendricks-Smith | ||
| 2 ♠ S | ♣ 10 | 50 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles | ||
| Board 18 East Deals N-S Vul |
♠ Q 8 2 ♥ Q 10 9 ♦ Q 7 2 ♣ A J 9 8 |
||||||||||
♠ K 4 ♥ K 6 3 2 ♦ A J 6 4 ♣ Q 4 3 |
|
♠ A 10 9 6 3 ♥ A J 8 ♦ 10 9 5 3 ♣ 2 |
|||||||||
| ♠ J 7 5 ♥ 7 5 4 ♦ K 8 ♣ K 10 7 6 5 |
|||||||||||
EW 4♥; EW 5♦; EW 3♠; EW 1N
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 2 ♠ E | ♦ K | 50 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 9-LaBove-Foster vs 6-Cosby-Adcock | ||
| 1 NT W | ♣ 8 | 120 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 2-Banks-Ambrozich vs 1-Schultz-Kelley | ||
| 1 NT W | ♣ 8 | 120 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 5-Heisler-Matzek vs 7-Lewis-Williams | ||
| 2 ♦ W | ♠ 2 | 150 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 3-Crader-Rice vs 8-Wendricks-Smith | ||
| 3 ♦ W | ♥ 10 | 150 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles | ||
| Board 19 South Deals E-W Vul |
♠ 7 2 ♥ A Q 10 8 ♦ A Q 9 5 ♣ Q J 6 |
||||||||||
♠ K 8 5 3 ♥ J 2 ♦ K J 7 2 ♣ 10 4 3 |
|
♠ 10 4 ♥ K 9 4 3 ♦ 10 8 4 ♣ A K 9 5 |
|||||||||
| ♠ A Q J 9 6 ♥ 7 6 5 ♦ 6 3 ♣ 8 7 2 |
|||||||||||
N 2♠; N 2♥; NS 1N; S 1♠; S 1♥; EW 1♦; EW 1♣
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 1 NT N | ♣ A | 120 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 4-Raxsdale-Pyles vs 9-LaBove-Foster | ||
| 2 ♠ N | ♥ 3 | 110 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1-Schultz-Kelley vs 7-Lewis-Williams | ||
| 2 ♠ N | ♣ A | 110 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3-Crader-Rice vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich | ||
| 2 ♠ N | ♣ A | 110 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 5-Heisler-Matzek | ||
| 1 NT N | ♥ 3 | 90 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 6-Cosby-Adcock vs 8-Wendricks-Smith | ||
| Board 20 West Deals Both Vul |
♠ K Q 8 5 ♥ K J 10 8 ♦ 10 7 ♣ J 7 5 |
||||||||||
♠ 9 6 4 2 ♥ 9 5 4 3 ♦ 4 ♣ 10 9 4 3 |
|
♠ A J 10 7 ♥ 7 6 ♦ A 8 5 2 ♣ A K 8 |
|||||||||
| ♠ 3 ♥ A Q 2 ♦ K Q J 9 6 3 ♣ Q 6 2 |
|||||||||||
N 3N; S 2N; EW 2♠; NS 2♥; NS 3♦; N 1♣
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 2 ♦ N | ♥ 7 | 130 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 6-Cosby-Adcock vs 8-Wendricks-Smith | ||
| 2 ♦ S | ♥ 3 | 130 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 5-Heisler-Matzek | ||
| 3 ♦ S | ♣ 10 | 110 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3-Crader-Rice vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich | ||
| 2 ♥ N | ♣ A | 100 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 4-Raxsdale-Pyles vs 9-LaBove-Foster | ||
| 4 ♥ N | ♣ A | 200 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 1-Schultz-Kelley vs 7-Lewis-Williams | ||
| Board 21 North Deals N-S Vul |
♠ A K 7 6 3 ♥ A J 10 ♦ J 10 6 2 ♣ 9 |
||||||||||
♠ J 9 4 ♥ 7 4 3 ♦ K 8 7 5 4 ♣ Q 4 |
|
♠ 10 8 5 ♥ 5 ♦ A Q 9 ♣ K 10 8 6 5 3 |
|||||||||
| ♠ Q 2 ♥ K Q 9 8 6 2 ♦ 3 ♣ A J 7 2 |
|||||||||||
NS 6♠; NS 6♥; NS 4N; NS 1♦; NS 1♣
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 4 ♥ S | ♣ Q | 710 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 4-Raxsdale-Pyles vs 9-LaBove-Foster | ||
| 4 ♥ S | ♦ 5 | 680 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1-Schultz-Kelley vs 7-Lewis-Williams | ||
| 4 ♥ S | ♣ 9 | 680 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3-Crader-Rice vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich | ||
| 4 ♥ S | ♦ 5 | 680 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 5-Heisler-Matzek | ||
| 4 ♥ S | ♦ 5 | 650 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 6-Cosby-Adcock vs 8-Wendricks-Smith | ||
| Board 22 East Deals E-W Vul |
♠ A Q 5 ♥ J 8 3 ♦ A Q 8 7 ♣ A J 7 |
||||||||||
♠ 9 ♥ 10 7 5 ♦ K J 10 9 4 2 ♣ K 9 3 |
|
♠ K 10 7 6 3 ♥ Q 6 4 2 ♦ — ♣ Q 8 6 4 |
|||||||||
| ♠ J 8 4 2 ♥ A K 9 ♦ 6 5 3 ♣ 10 5 2 |
|||||||||||
NS 3N; NS 3♠; NS 1♥; NS 1♦; NS 1♣
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 3 NT N | ♣ 4 | 430 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 2-Banks-Ambrozich vs 8-Wendricks-Smith | ||
| 2 NT N | ♠ 6 | 150 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 5-Heisler-Matzek vs 1-Schultz-Kelley | ||
| 3 NT N | ♥ 2 | 50 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 6-Cosby-Adcock | ||
| 3 NT S | ♦ J | 100 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 7-Lewis-Williams vs 9-LaBove-Foster | ||
| 4 ♠ S | ♦ J | 200 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4-Raxsdale-Pyles vs 3-Crader-Rice | ||
| Board 23 South Deals Both Vul |
♠ K 7 4 ♥ J 10 8 6 4 2 ♦ 4 2 ♣ Q 10 |
||||||||||
♠ 10 8 3 2 ♥ Q 9 ♦ K 10 5 3 ♣ J 9 8 |
|
♠ A Q J 9 5 ♥ 3 ♦ A Q 8 7 ♣ K 5 3 |
|||||||||
| ♠ 6 ♥ A K 7 5 ♦ J 9 6 ♣ A 7 6 4 2 |
|||||||||||
EW 4♠; NS 3♥; EW 4♦; NS 1♣
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 3 ♥ N | ♥ 3 | 170 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 2-Banks-Ambrozich vs 8-Wendricks-Smith | ||
| 4 ♠ E | ♥ A | 100 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 5-Heisler-Matzek vs 1-Schultz-Kelley | ||
| 4 ♠ E | ♥ A | 100 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 6-Cosby-Adcock | ||
| 3 ♠ E | ♥ A | 140 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 4-Raxsdale-Pyles vs 3-Crader-Rice | ||
| 3 ♠ E | ♥ A | 170 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 7-Lewis-Williams vs 9-LaBove-Foster | ||
| Board 24 West Deals None Vul |
♠ A Q 5 3 ♥ Q 6 2 ♦ J 10 ♣ K J 7 3 |
||||||||||
♠ 10 7 2 ♥ 7 4 ♦ 8 7 5 4 3 ♣ A 10 9 |
|
♠ K 9 4 ♥ A 5 ♦ K Q 6 2 ♣ Q 8 5 4 |
|||||||||
| ♠ J 8 6 ♥ K J 10 9 8 3 ♦ A 9 ♣ 6 2 |
|||||||||||
NS 3♥; NS 2♠; NS 1N; EW 2♦; EW 1♣
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 2 ♥ S | ♦ 8 | 140 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 2-Banks-Ambrozich vs 8-Wendricks-Smith | ||
| 3 ♥ S | ♣ 5 | 140 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 7-Lewis-Williams vs 9-LaBove-Foster | ||
| 3 ♥ S | ♦ 8 | 140 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 6-Cosby-Adcock | ||
| 3 ♥ S | ♦ 5 | 50 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 4-Raxsdale-Pyles vs 3-Crader-Rice | ||
| 4 ♥ S | ♦ 8 | 50 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 5-Heisler-Matzek vs 1-Schultz-Kelley | ||
| Board 25 North Deals E-W Vul |
♠ 10 9 5 ♥ 9 8 ♦ 9 5 4 ♣ Q 10 9 7 4 |
||||||||||
♠ A Q 7 4 ♥ A Q 7 6 4 3 2 ♦ 7 ♣ 2 |
|
♠ J 8 3 ♥ K 10 5 ♦ J 8 2 ♣ J 6 5 3 |
|||||||||
| ♠ K 6 2 ♥ J ♦ A K Q 10 6 3 ♣ A K 8 |
|||||||||||
EW 4♥; NS 3♦; NS 3♣; EW 1♠
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 4 ♦ S | ♣ 2 | 150 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 6-Cosby-Adcock vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich | ||
| 4 ♦ S | ♣ 2 | 150 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 7-Lewis-Williams | ||
| 5 ♦ S | ♥ A | 100 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3-Crader-Rice vs 9-LaBove-Foster | ||
| 5 ♦ x S | ♥ A | 300 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 8-Wendricks-Smith vs 1-Schultz-Kelley | ||
| 4 ♥ x W | ♦ 9 | 790 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 5-Heisler-Matzek vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles | ||
| Board 26 East Deals Both Vul |
♠ K J 7 ♥ K 5 ♦ 10 9 8 4 ♣ A J 5 4 |
||||||||||
♠ 4 ♥ A Q J 8 7 2 ♦ Q 5 ♣ 10 8 7 6 |
|
♠ A Q 10 5 2 ♥ 4 ♦ K 3 ♣ K Q 9 3 2 |
|||||||||
| ♠ 9 8 6 3 ♥ 10 9 6 3 ♦ A J 7 6 2 ♣ — |
|||||||||||
EW 5♣; E 3♥; E 2N; W 2♥; EW 1♠
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 3 ♥ W | ♦ 10 | 200 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 5-Heisler-Matzek vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles | ||
| 5 ♣ E | ♠ 3 | 100 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3-Crader-Rice vs 9-LaBove-Foster | ||
| 4 ♥ W | ♦ 10 | 100 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 8-Wendricks-Smith vs 1-Schultz-Kelley | ||
| 3 NT E | ♦ 7 | 100 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 7-Lewis-Williams | ||
| 2 ♣ E | ♠ 9 | 130 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 6-Cosby-Adcock vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich | ||
| Board 27 South Deals None Vul |
♠ 6 5 4 ♥ K 8 5 2 ♦ A 9 8 7 ♣ 6 5 |
||||||||||
♠ K 10 8 3 ♥ 10 9 ♦ J 10 3 ♣ J 10 8 2 |
|
♠ A ♥ A Q 6 3 ♦ K Q 6 2 ♣ Q 9 4 3 |
|||||||||
| ♠ Q J 9 7 2 ♥ J 7 4 ♦ 5 4 ♣ A K 7 |
|||||||||||
E 3N; W 2N; EW 3♦; EW 3♣; N 1♠; EW 1♥
| Contract | Lead | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | ||||
| 3 ♦ E | ♣ A | 50 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 5-Heisler-Matzek vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles | ||
| 3 ♣ W | ♠ 6 | 50 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 10-Luehring-Stockford vs 7-Lewis-Williams | ||
| 3 ♣ W | ♠ 6 | 110 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3-Crader-Rice vs 9-LaBove-Foster | ||
| 3 ♣ W | ♠ 2 | 130 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 6-Cosby-Adcock vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich | ||
| 2 ♠ S | ♦ J | 150 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 8-Wendricks-Smith vs 1-Schultz-Kelley | ||