EVENT>LM/NLM Mixer             |SESSION>Monday Eve   |SECTION> A
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>November 14, 2011  |CLUB NO.>199240    | 11/14/2011 21:42
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Gene LaBove     |RATING>Club Masterpoint (80% Open)  |MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   54.0 |TOP>   4 |MP LIMITS>None           |CLUB>Village Card Club, Inc.
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS> 10                                        ,------------,-------,-------------,------,------,
-------------------------------------------------|   Section  |Handi- |   Section   |      |Sect. |
No Name                   Name                   | Rank| Total|  cap  |  Rank|Score | Pct  |Awards|
------------------------------------------------- ----- ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ 
 1 Betty Schultz          Kim Kelley                     56.00    7.50         48.50  44.91       
 2 Ray Banks              Gynnie Ambrozich         1     69.50    5.50   1     64.00  59.26  0.80 
 3 Wanda Crader           Becky Rice                     57.50    2.50         55.00  50.93       
 4 Helen Raxsdale         Kenneth Pyles                  53.00    5.00         48.00  44.44       
 5 Millie Heisler         Milton Matzek            4     62.50    2.50   2     60.00  55.56  0.42 
 6 Andy Cosby             Tricia Adcock                  46.50    5.50         41.00  37.96       
 7 Luci Lewis             Mack Williams                  57.50    3.50         54.00  50.00       
 8 Richard Wendricks      Danielle Smith           2     69.00    9.50   3     59.50  55.09  0.48 
 9 Teri LaBove            Mary Ann Foster                56.00    4.00         52.00  48.15       
10 Nancy Luehring         Mary Kay Stockford       3     64.50    6.50   4     58.00  53.70  0.34 

                                          Totals        592.00   52.00        540.00       


111114E

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
♠ A J 9 3

K 9 7 6 5 4
♣ Q 4 2
♠ 10 7 5
Q 8 6 2
8 3 2
♣ A K 3
N
WE
S
♠ —
K 10 9 7 5 3
A Q J 10
♣ 10 8 5
♠ K Q 8 6 4 2
A J 4

♣ J 9 7 6

NS 5♠; EW 5; NS 1N; N 2♣; S 1♣

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
4 S♣ A4503.001.006-Cosby-Adcock vs 5-Heisler-Matzek
4 ♠ N♣ A4503.001.007-Lewis-Williams vs 3-Crader-Rice
4 ♠ S♣ A4503.001.0010-Luehring-Stockford vs 8-Wendricks-Smith
2 ♠ S♣ A1701.003.009-LaBove-Foster vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich
4 ♠ x S♣ A1000.004.004-Raxsdale-Pyles vs 1-Schultz-Kelley

111114E

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
♠ 6 3 2
A K Q
Q 10 9 2
♣ A K 2
♠ J 9
J 6
A K 8 7 6 5
♣ 9 5 3
N
WE
S
♠ A K Q 10 8 5 4
8 7 3 2

♣ 6 4
♠ 7
10 9 5 4
J 4 3
♣ Q J 10 8 7

EW 3♠; NS 2; NS 3♣; NS 1

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
4 ♠ x E♣ Q1004.000.004-Raxsdale-Pyles vs 1-Schultz-Kelley
3 ♠ E♣ Q503.001.0010-Luehring-Stockford vs 8-Wendricks-Smith
4 ♣ S♠ J1002.002.007-Lewis-Williams vs 3-Crader-Rice
3 ♠ E♣ Q1401.003.009-LaBove-Foster vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich
2 NT N♠ A4000.004.006-Cosby-Adcock vs 5-Heisler-Matzek

111114E

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
♠ A K 2
K Q 3
Q 7 6 4
♣ 9 8 2
♠ Q J 10 9 8 7 4
J 10 4
A K
♣ A
N
WE
S
♠ 5 3
9 8 7 5 2
J 10 9 8
♣ 6 3
♠ 6
A 6
5 3 2
♣ K Q J 10 7 5 4

NS 4N; NS 4♣; EW 2♠; NS 2; EW 1

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
3 NT N♠ 34904.000.009-LaBove-Foster vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich
3 NT N♠ 54603.001.007-Lewis-Williams vs 3-Crader-Rice
3 NT N 54302.002.0010-Luehring-Stockford vs 8-Wendricks-Smith
3 ♠ W♣ 91001.003.006-Cosby-Adcock vs 5-Heisler-Matzek
5 ♣ x S K1000.004.004-Raxsdale-Pyles vs 1-Schultz-Kelley

111114E

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
♠ K Q 7 6 5 2

J 8 2
♣ K Q 8 7
♠ J 3
A K 10 6
A Q 10 7 5
♣ 9 4
N
WE
S
♠ 9 8 4
J 9 5 4
9
♣ A 10 6 5 2
♠ A 10
Q 8 7 3 2
K 6 4 3
♣ J 3

NS 3♠; EW 3; S 1N; EW 1; EW 1♣

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
3 W♣ K3004.000.007-Lewis-Williams vs 6-Cosby-Adcock
2 ♠ N 91402.002.005-Heisler-Matzek vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich
3 ♠ N 91402.002.008-Wendricks-Smith vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles
3 ♠ N 91402.002.0010-Luehring-Stockford vs 9-LaBove-Foster
4 ♠ N 91000.004.001-Schultz-Kelley vs 3-Crader-Rice

111114E

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
♠ K 9
J 7 3
J 8 2
♣ A 8 7 5 4
♠ Q 10 8
A Q 10 8 6 5 2

♣ Q J 6
N
WE
S
♠ A 7 6 5 4 3
9
K 10 7 4
♣ 10 3
♠ J 2
K 4
A Q 9 6 5 3
♣ K 9 2

EW 3♠; EW 3; S 2N; NS 2; S 2♣; N 1♣

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
4 ♠ E A504.000.005-Heisler-Matzek vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich
3 W J1402.501.507-Lewis-Williams vs 6-Cosby-Adcock
3 W 21402.501.5010-Luehring-Stockford vs 9-LaBove-Foster
5 S A3000.503.501-Schultz-Kelley vs 3-Crader-Rice
4 S A3000.503.508-Wendricks-Smith vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles

111114E

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
♠ 10 7 6 4 3
J 7
A 7
♣ J 10 7 2
♠ K 9 5 2
A 4
J 8 6 3
♣ A 6 4
N
WE
S
♠ Q J
K 10 8 6 3
Q 9 2
♣ 8 5 3
♠ A 8
Q 9 5 2
K 10 5 4
♣ K Q 9

NS 1♠; EW 1; NS 1♣

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
2 ♠ N♣ 81104.000.008-Wendricks-Smith vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles
1 NT S♠ 2501.502.501-Schultz-Kelley vs 3-Crader-Rice
1 NT S♠ 2501.502.505-Heisler-Matzek vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich
1 NT S♠ 2501.502.507-Lewis-Williams vs 6-Cosby-Adcock
1 NT S♠ 2501.502.5010-Luehring-Stockford vs 9-LaBove-Foster

111114E

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
♠ J 10
Q 10
K Q 8 7 6
♣ J 9 6 5
♠ 7
A J 9 6 2
J 10 3 2
♣ K 8 7
N
WE
S
♠ A 5 4 3
8 7 5 4 3
9 5
♣ A 3
♠ K Q 9 8 6 2
K
A 4
♣ Q 10 4 2

EW 3; NS 2♠; NS 2♣; NS 1

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
2 ♠ S J1403.500.508-Wendricks-Smith vs 7-Lewis-Williams
2 ♠ S J1403.500.509-LaBove-Foster vs 5-Heisler-Matzek
2 ♠ S 21102.002.006-Cosby-Adcock vs 3-Crader-Rice
3 W♠ J1701.003.002-Banks-Ambrozich vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles
4 W♠ J6200.004.0010-Luehring-Stockford vs 1-Schultz-Kelley

111114E

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
♠ J 7 4
A 4 3
A 6 4 3 2
♣ A J
♠ A 6 5
J
J 10 7 5
♣ 8 6 5 4 2
N
WE
S
♠ K 10 2
K 10 9 8 6 5
K Q 9
♣ 3
♠ Q 9 8 3
Q 7 2
8
♣ K Q 10 9 7

NS 2N; NS 2♠; NS 2♣; EW 1

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
3 E 81004.000.002-Banks-Ambrozich vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles
2 ♠ S J503.001.0010-Luehring-Stockford vs 1-Schultz-Kelley
3 ♠ S J1001.502.506-Cosby-Adcock vs 3-Crader-Rice
3 ♠ S J1001.502.508-Wendricks-Smith vs 7-Lewis-Williams
2 E 81100.004.009-LaBove-Foster vs 5-Heisler-Matzek

111114E

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
♠ 10 6
K 5 3
A Q J 6 3
♣ 9 7 4
♠ K Q 4 3
10 7 2
7 5
♣ 8 6 5 2
N
WE
S
♠ A 8 7 5
A Q 9 8 6
10 4
♣ Q 10
♠ J 9 2
J 4
K 9 8 2
♣ A K J 3

EW 2♠; EW 2; NS 3; NS 1N; NS 2♣

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
3 N 101504.000.002-Banks-Ambrozich vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles
3 N♣ Q1303.001.006-Cosby-Adcock vs 3-Crader-Rice
2 E♣ A1001.502.508-Wendricks-Smith vs 7-Lewis-Williams
2 E♣ A1001.502.5010-Luehring-Stockford vs 1-Schultz-Kelley
2 ♠ W♣ 71100.004.009-LaBove-Foster vs 5-Heisler-Matzek

111114E

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
♠ A J 10 6
K J 10 9
10 7
♣ K 10 5
♠ K 3
A 7 5 3
A K J 9 2
♣ A 4
N
WE
S
♠ 8 5 4 2
Q 8 4
8 4 3
♣ 8 7 2
♠ Q 9 7
6 2
Q 6 5
♣ Q J 9 6 3

NS 2♠; NS 3♣; EW 2; EW 1

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
3 W♣ K2004.000.007-Lewis-Williams vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles
2 NT W J1003.001.0010-Luehring-Stockford vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich
1 NT S A901.502.503-Crader-Rice vs 5-Heisler-Matzek
2 ♣ S♠ K901.502.509-LaBove-Foster vs 8-Wendricks-Smith
2 W♣ 5900.004.001-Schultz-Kelley vs 6-Cosby-Adcock

111114E

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
♠ K 4
Q 10 5 4 3
Q 4
♣ A J 9 4
♠ A Q 10 8 2
A 8 7
9 7
♣ 8 6 2
N
WE
S
♠ J 6 5
J 9
10 8 3 2
♣ K Q 7 5
♠ 9 7 3
K 6 2
A K J 6 5
♣ 10 3

NS 4; NS 4; NS 2N; NS 2♣; EW 1♠

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
4 N♠ 54503.500.501-Schultz-Kelley vs 6-Cosby-Adcock
4 N♠ J4503.500.507-Lewis-Williams vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles
3 N♠ 52002.002.0010-Luehring-Stockford vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich
3 N 21401.003.003-Crader-Rice vs 5-Heisler-Matzek
3 NT N♠ 5500.004.009-LaBove-Foster vs 8-Wendricks-Smith

111114E

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
♠ K J 8 4
7 4
A 2
♣ Q J 10 5 3
♠ Q 3 2
A K 6 5
J 7 5 3
♣ 8 2
N
WE
S
♠ 7 5
J 10 9 8 3
8 6 4
♣ A 9 7
♠ A 10 9 6
Q 2
K Q 10 9
♣ K 6 4

NS 4♠; NS 4♣; NS 3; NS 1N; EW 1

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
4 ♠ N J6203.500.501-Schultz-Kelley vs 6-Cosby-Adcock
4 ♠ S A6203.500.503-Crader-Rice vs 5-Heisler-Matzek
3 ♠ N J1702.002.0010-Luehring-Stockford vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich
2 NT S♣ 51000.503.507-Lewis-Williams vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles
4 ♠ N J1000.503.509-LaBove-Foster vs 8-Wendricks-Smith

111114E

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
♠ J 6 5 3 2
10 5 3
Q 10 9 6
♣ K
♠ 8 4
A K 7 6 4
K 8 4
♣ 10 7 3
N
WE
S
♠ A K
J 9 8
A 7 3 2
♣ Q J 8 5
♠ Q 10 9 7
Q 2
J 5
♣ A 9 6 4 2

EW 5; EW 3N; EW 3; EW 3♣; NS 1♠

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
3 NT E♠ 71004.000.002-Banks-Ambrozich vs 7-Lewis-Williams
3 NT E♠ 76003.001.008-Wendricks-Smith vs 5-Heisler-Matzek
4 E♠ 96502.002.004-Raxsdale-Pyles vs 6-Cosby-Adcock
3 NT E♣ 46601.003.0010-Luehring-Stockford vs 3-Crader-Rice
3 NT E♠ 76900.004.001-Schultz-Kelley vs 9-LaBove-Foster

111114E

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
♠ 8 2
K 10 4
A J 6 5
♣ 10 7 4 2
♠ A 6
9 8 2
Q 8 7 2
♣ 8 6 5 3
N
WE
S
♠ K 7 4
Q J 7 6 5
9 4
♣ A K 9
♠ Q J 10 9 5 3
A 3
K 10 3
♣ Q J

NS 2♠; NS 2; EW 1; NS 1♣

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
2 ♠ S 91403.500.504-Raxsdale-Pyles vs 6-Cosby-Adcock
3 ♠ S 91403.500.5010-Luehring-Stockford vs 3-Crader-Rice
2 ♠ S 91102.002.008-Wendricks-Smith vs 5-Heisler-Matzek
2 E♠ Q501.003.001-Schultz-Kelley vs 9-LaBove-Foster
3 ♠ S 9500.004.002-Banks-Ambrozich vs 7-Lewis-Williams

111114E

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
♠ K 2
A 6 5 2
K 7
♣ K 9 8 7 5
♠ J 8 6 5
10 9 8 3
8 3
♣ Q 4 3
N
WE
S
♠ Q 9 7 4 3
K Q J
J 10 9 5
♣ J
♠ A 10
7 4
A Q 6 4 2
♣ A 10 6 2

NS 6♣; NS 5N; NS 5; NS 3

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
3 NT N J6904.000.008-Wendricks-Smith vs 5-Heisler-Matzek
3 NT S♠ 56601.502.501-Schultz-Kelley vs 9-LaBove-Foster
3 NT N♠ J6601.502.502-Banks-Ambrozich vs 7-Lewis-Williams
3 NT N 66601.502.504-Raxsdale-Pyles vs 6-Cosby-Adcock
3 NT S♠ 56601.502.5010-Luehring-Stockford vs 3-Crader-Rice

111114E

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
♠ 8 4
A K J
Q 5
♣ Q J 8 7 5 4
♠ 9 6 2
10 4
A K J 9 8 2
♣ A 2
N
WE
S
♠ A Q 7 5 3
Q 9 6 5 2
10
♣ 6 3
♠ K J 10
8 7 3
7 6 4 3
♣ K 10 9

EW 3♠; EW 2N; EW 2; EW 2; NS 2♣

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
3 NT W♣ 74004.000.005-Heisler-Matzek vs 7-Lewis-Williams
3 NT W A2003.001.002-Banks-Ambrozich vs 1-Schultz-Kelley
3 ♠ E♣ 101001.502.509-LaBove-Foster vs 6-Cosby-Adcock
3 ♠ E♣ K1001.502.5010-Luehring-Stockford vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles
3 ♣ N 10500.004.003-Crader-Rice vs 8-Wendricks-Smith

111114E

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
♠ 9 6 5 3 2
7 6
9 4 2
♣ Q 8 5
♠ A K Q 4
K 9 5
8 7 6
♣ 10 9 3
N
WE
S
♠ 10 8
Q 10 8 4 2
K J 5
♣ K 6 2
♠ J 7
A J 3
A Q 10 3
♣ A J 7 4

NS 2♠; EW 2; E 1N; NS 2; NS 2♣

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
2 ♠ S♠ A1404.000.002-Banks-Ambrozich vs 1-Schultz-Kelley
2 ♠ S♣ 101102.501.505-Heisler-Matzek vs 7-Lewis-Williams
2 ♠ S♠ A1102.501.509-LaBove-Foster vs 6-Cosby-Adcock
2 ♠ S♠ A500.503.503-Crader-Rice vs 8-Wendricks-Smith
2 ♠ S♣ 10500.503.5010-Luehring-Stockford vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles

111114E

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
♠ Q 8 2
Q 10 9
Q 7 2
♣ A J 9 8
♠ K 4
K 6 3 2
A J 6 4
♣ Q 4 3
N
WE
S
♠ A 10 9 6 3
A J 8
10 9 5 3
♣ 2
♠ J 7 5
7 5 4
K 8
♣ K 10 7 6 5

EW 4; EW 5; EW 3♠; EW 1N

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
2 ♠ E K504.000.009-LaBove-Foster vs 6-Cosby-Adcock
1 NT W♣ 81202.501.502-Banks-Ambrozich vs 1-Schultz-Kelley
1 NT W♣ 81202.501.505-Heisler-Matzek vs 7-Lewis-Williams
2 W♠ 21500.503.503-Crader-Rice vs 8-Wendricks-Smith
3 W 101500.503.5010-Luehring-Stockford vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles

111114E

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
♠ 7 2
A Q 10 8
A Q 9 5
♣ Q J 6
♠ K 8 5 3
J 2
K J 7 2
♣ 10 4 3
N
WE
S
♠ 10 4
K 9 4 3
10 8 4
♣ A K 9 5
♠ A Q J 9 6
7 6 5
6 3
♣ 8 7 2

N 2♠; N 2; NS 1N; S 1♠; S 1; EW 1; EW 1♣

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
1 NT N♣ A1204.000.004-Raxsdale-Pyles vs 9-LaBove-Foster
2 ♠ N 31102.002.001-Schultz-Kelley vs 7-Lewis-Williams
2 ♠ N♣ A1102.002.003-Crader-Rice vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich
2 ♠ N♣ A1102.002.0010-Luehring-Stockford vs 5-Heisler-Matzek
1 NT N 3900.004.006-Cosby-Adcock vs 8-Wendricks-Smith

111114E

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
♠ K Q 8 5
K J 10 8
10 7
♣ J 7 5
♠ 9 6 4 2
9 5 4 3
4
♣ 10 9 4 3
N
WE
S
♠ A J 10 7
7 6
A 8 5 2
♣ A K 8
♠ 3
A Q 2
K Q J 9 6 3
♣ Q 6 2

N 3N; S 2N; EW 2♠; NS 2; NS 3; N 1♣

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
2 N 71303.500.506-Cosby-Adcock vs 8-Wendricks-Smith
2 S 31303.500.5010-Luehring-Stockford vs 5-Heisler-Matzek
3 S♣ 101102.002.003-Crader-Rice vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich
2 N♣ A1001.003.004-Raxsdale-Pyles vs 9-LaBove-Foster
4 N♣ A2000.004.001-Schultz-Kelley vs 7-Lewis-Williams

111114E

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
♠ A K 7 6 3
A J 10
J 10 6 2
♣ 9
♠ J 9 4
7 4 3
K 8 7 5 4
♣ Q 4
N
WE
S
♠ 10 8 5
5
A Q 9
♣ K 10 8 6 5 3
♠ Q 2
K Q 9 8 6 2
3
♣ A J 7 2

NS 6♠; NS 6; NS 4N; NS 1; NS 1♣

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
4 S♣ Q7104.000.004-Raxsdale-Pyles vs 9-LaBove-Foster
4 S 56802.002.001-Schultz-Kelley vs 7-Lewis-Williams
4 S♣ 96802.002.003-Crader-Rice vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich
4 S 56802.002.0010-Luehring-Stockford vs 5-Heisler-Matzek
4 S 56500.004.006-Cosby-Adcock vs 8-Wendricks-Smith

111114E

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
♠ A Q 5
J 8 3
A Q 8 7
♣ A J 7
♠ 9
10 7 5
K J 10 9 4 2
♣ K 9 3
N
WE
S
♠ K 10 7 6 3
Q 6 4 2

♣ Q 8 6 4
♠ J 8 4 2
A K 9
6 5 3
♣ 10 5 2

NS 3N; NS 3♠; NS 1; NS 1; NS 1♣

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
3 NT N♣ 44304.000.002-Banks-Ambrozich vs 8-Wendricks-Smith
2 NT N♠ 61503.001.005-Heisler-Matzek vs 1-Schultz-Kelley
3 NT N 2502.002.0010-Luehring-Stockford vs 6-Cosby-Adcock
3 NT S J1001.003.007-Lewis-Williams vs 9-LaBove-Foster
4 ♠ S J2000.004.004-Raxsdale-Pyles vs 3-Crader-Rice

111114E

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
♠ K 7 4
J 10 8 6 4 2
4 2
♣ Q 10
♠ 10 8 3 2
Q 9
K 10 5 3
♣ J 9 8
N
WE
S
♠ A Q J 9 5
3
A Q 8 7
♣ K 5 3
♠ 6
A K 7 5
J 9 6
♣ A 7 6 4 2

EW 4♠; NS 3; EW 4; NS 1♣

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
3 N 31704.000.002-Banks-Ambrozich vs 8-Wendricks-Smith
4 ♠ E A1002.501.505-Heisler-Matzek vs 1-Schultz-Kelley
4 ♠ E A1002.501.5010-Luehring-Stockford vs 6-Cosby-Adcock
3 ♠ E A1401.003.004-Raxsdale-Pyles vs 3-Crader-Rice
3 ♠ E A1700.004.007-Lewis-Williams vs 9-LaBove-Foster

111114E

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
♠ A Q 5 3
Q 6 2
J 10
♣ K J 7 3
♠ 10 7 2
7 4
8 7 5 4 3
♣ A 10 9
N
WE
S
♠ K 9 4
A 5
K Q 6 2
♣ Q 8 5 4
♠ J 8 6
K J 10 9 8 3
A 9
♣ 6 2

NS 3; NS 2♠; NS 1N; EW 2; EW 1♣

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
2 S 81403.001.002-Banks-Ambrozich vs 8-Wendricks-Smith
3 S♣ 51403.001.007-Lewis-Williams vs 9-LaBove-Foster
3 S 81403.001.0010-Luehring-Stockford vs 6-Cosby-Adcock
3 S 5500.503.504-Raxsdale-Pyles vs 3-Crader-Rice
4 S 8500.503.505-Heisler-Matzek vs 1-Schultz-Kelley

111114E

Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
♠ 10 9 5
9 8
9 5 4
♣ Q 10 9 7 4
♠ A Q 7 4
A Q 7 6 4 3 2
7
♣ 2
N
WE
S
♠ J 8 3
K 10 5
J 8 2
♣ J 6 5 3
♠ K 6 2
J
A K Q 10 6 3
♣ A K 8

EW 4; NS 3; NS 3♣; EW 1♠

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
4 S♣ 21503.500.506-Cosby-Adcock vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich
4 S♣ 21503.500.5010-Luehring-Stockford vs 7-Lewis-Williams
5 S A1002.002.003-Crader-Rice vs 9-LaBove-Foster
5 x S A3001.003.008-Wendricks-Smith vs 1-Schultz-Kelley
4 x W 97900.004.005-Heisler-Matzek vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles

111114E

Board 26
East Deals
Both Vul
♠ K J 7
K 5
10 9 8 4
♣ A J 5 4
♠ 4
A Q J 8 7 2
Q 5
♣ 10 8 7 6
N
WE
S
♠ A Q 10 5 2
4
K 3
♣ K Q 9 3 2
♠ 9 8 6 3
10 9 6 3
A J 7 6 2
♣ —

EW 5♣; E 3; E 2N; W 2; EW 1♠

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
3 W 102004.000.005-Heisler-Matzek vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles
5 ♣ E♠ 31002.002.003-Crader-Rice vs 9-LaBove-Foster
4 W 101002.002.008-Wendricks-Smith vs 1-Schultz-Kelley
3 NT E 71002.002.0010-Luehring-Stockford vs 7-Lewis-Williams
2 ♣ E♠ 91300.004.006-Cosby-Adcock vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich

111114E

Board 27
South Deals
None Vul
♠ 6 5 4
K 8 5 2
A 9 8 7
♣ 6 5
♠ K 10 8 3
10 9
J 10 3
♣ J 10 8 2
N
WE
S
♠ A
A Q 6 3
K Q 6 2
♣ Q 9 4 3
♠ Q J 9 7 2
J 7 4
5 4
♣ A K 7

E 3N; W 2N; EW 3; EW 3♣; N 1♠; EW 1

ContractLeadScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W
3 E♣ A503.500.505-Heisler-Matzek vs 4-Raxsdale-Pyles
3 ♣ W♠ 6503.500.5010-Luehring-Stockford vs 7-Lewis-Williams
3 ♣ W♠ 61102.002.003-Crader-Rice vs 9-LaBove-Foster
3 ♣ W♠ 21301.003.006-Cosby-Adcock vs 2-Banks-Ambrozich
2 ♠ S J1500.004.008-Wendricks-Smith vs 1-Schultz-Kelley